Home » Java » Enterprise Java » Crossing The JUnit Streams

About Ashley Frieze

Ashley Frieze
Software developer, stand-up comedian, musician, writer, jolly big cheer-monkey, skeptical thinker, Doctor Who fan, lover of fine sounds

Crossing The JUnit Streams

One of the nice things about JUnit 5 migration is that you can run your JUnit 4 tests in vintage mode and everything’s still compatible. One of the down sides is that some of the annotations and methods have the same name in JUnit 4 and JUnit 5 and it’s very easy, when both sets of the library dependencies are available, to import the wrong stuff and produce a test that doesn’t make work.

It’s worse, though, when the test that doesn’t make sense also doesn’t fail the build.

Consider this test:

01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
import org.junit.Test;
import org.junit.jupiter.api.BeforeEach;
 
import static org.junit.Assert.assertEquals;
 
public class AccidentalJUnit4Test {
    @BeforeEach
    public void beforeEach() {
 
    }
 
    @Test
    public void test() {
        assertEquals(1, 1);
    }
}

This is some horrific soup of JUnit 5’s annotations and JUnit 4’s. It runs in the IDE, but in the maven build it’s ignored as the @Test is from the wrong JUnit and I do not have junit-vintage running.

So run junit-vintage?

How Did This Occur?

In my case, I’ve imported TestContainers integration for JUnit 5, which has transitive dependencies to JUnit 4. That’s not great, but it’s not the end of the world. However, I only want JUnit 5 tests in my code, and yet I can accidentally write tests with JUnit 4 bits in, and nobody will notice!

These half formed tests were never meant to be, so I want them to fail the build.

What Doesn’t Work

  • Checkstyle – checkstyle could scan for forbidden import statements, but I don’t scan src/test with it, and the checkstyle rules for our project are shared with another project which uses junit-vintage in a valid way.
  • Macker – a complex scanner which seems not to have an answer out of the box
  • Enforcer – this would stop me from including the JUnit 4 dependency… except I can’t help but allow that

Why Should I Care?

Making things mistake proof by adding automation to spot known errors and tell you about them is much better than leaving warnings around the place, with the error still possible.

It’s like when someone puts up a sign saying warning this water is very hot rather than providing water at the right temperature!

Anything which can give us a forcing function is a benefit.

What Does Work

I found a silly and simple answer to this on GitHub.

This Maven Grep plugin works well:

01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
<build>
    <plugins>
      <!-- grep maven plugin set to filter naughty JUnit4 stuff -->
      <plugin>
        <groupId>net.radai</groupId>
        <artifactId>grep-maven-plugin</artifactId>
        <version>1.1</version>
        <executions>
          <execution>
            <goals>
              <goal>grep</goal>
            </goals>
            <phase>test</phase>
            <configuration>
              <greps>
                <grep>
                  <failIfFound>true</failIfFound>
                  <filePattern>src/test/java/**/*.java</filePattern>
                  <grepPattern>import\s+(static\s+)?org\.junit\.(Assert|Test|Before|After|AfterClass|Assume|BeforeClass|ClassRule|Rule|FixMethodOrder|Ignore|Rule)</grepPattern>
                  <outputPattern>Found JUnit 4 imports in file ${fileName} at line ${lineNumber} : ${line}</outputPattern>
                </grep>
              </greps>
            </configuration>
          </execution>
        </executions>
      </plugin>
    </plugins>
  </build>
 
<!-- you also need to add the distribution repo -->
  <pluginRepositories>
    <pluginRepository>
      <id>ossrh</id>
    </pluginRepository>
  </pluginRepositories>

The above will work for me to prevent a mistake happening, it may work for you.

I’ve placed a working (well, failing for the right reasons) example of the above code in GitHub.

Credit Where It’s Due

I nearly gave up on the above problem. Luckily, the open source community is brilliant.

Radai Rosenblatt wrote this plug-in in 2016. A contributor called Michal Lozinski added the file pattern scanning in 2017.

When we first tried to use the above configuration it didn’t work. The docs didn’t describe how to do this, but reading the code of the plugin showed that filePattern could be used. However, it didn’t work.

I contacted Radai today and he updated the release of the plug-in, and now it works.

Without open source, this wouldn’t be possible. Without authors taking responsibility for doing favours to strangers, this wouldn’t be possible.

Thanks!!!

Published on Java Code Geeks with permission by Ashley Frieze, partner at our JCG program. See the original article here: Crossing The JUnit Streams

Opinions expressed by Java Code Geeks contributors are their own.

(0 rating, 0 votes)
You need to be a registered member to rate this.
Start the discussion Views Tweet it!
Do you want to know how to develop your skillset to become a Java Rockstar?
Subscribe to our newsletter to start Rocking right now!
To get you started we give you our best selling eBooks for FREE!
1. JPA Mini Book
2. JVM Troubleshooting Guide
3. JUnit Tutorial for Unit Testing
4. Java Annotations Tutorial
5. Java Interview Questions
6. Spring Interview Questions
7. Android UI Design
and many more ....
I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments