This post is my personal and opinionated assessment of some of the most significant developers related to software development in 2015. My previous years’ assessment are available for 2014, 2013, 2012, 2011, 2010, 2009, 2008, and 2007. As with these previous years’ assessments, this assessment of 2015’s major developments in software development are obviously biased, opinionated, and limited to my perspective.
10. Internet of Things
The concept of Internet of Things has been popular for multiple years, but it seemed like I saw it all over the non-development mainstream press more than ever in 2015. Examples of Internet of Things stories from non-development outlets include Forbes‘s Roundup Of Internet of Things Forecasts and Market Estimates, 2015 and 17 ‘Internet Of Things’ Facts Everyone Should Read (their 2014 article A Simple Explanation Of ‘The Internet Of Things’ is also useful), The Motley Fool‘s The Best Internet of Things Stocks of 2015, Politico‘s What Washington really knows about the Internet of Things, Business Insider’s How the ‘Internet of Things’ will affect the world, Inc.‘s The ‘Internet of Things’ Is a Bad Idea, Fox News‘s Why the Internet of Things is a double-edged sword, CNN‘s Your TV may be watching you, ABC News‘s How to Keep Your Fridge From Exposing Your Data, CBS News‘s FTC: ‘Internet of Things’ poses consumer risks, NBC News‘s Can the ‘Internet of Things’ Preserve Privacy?: Lawmakers, The New York Times‘s Diving Headfirst Into the Internet of Things and The Internet of Way Too Many Things, and The Denver Post‘s Denver tech community ponders morality of building Internet of Things.
Most of the stories cited above focus on the benefits versus the risks and trade-offs (primarily to security and privacy) of moving to the Internet of Things.
9. Cloud Computing
Cloud computing is as strong as ever. In fact, it’s so strong and so prevalent, that I seriously considered leaving it off this list as such a general term just like I leave off other well-established and well-used general concepts such as Web Development, Mobile Development, REST, and Agile. However, I decided to put cloud computing on this list for at least one more year. Rick Blaisdell has published a post on his blog called 2015 Cloud Computing Recap: What has changed in the biggest vendors offerings? In this post, Blaisdell writes of ways that vendors contributed to adoption of cloud computing in 2015 related to Internet of Things, Microsoft Office 365, video delivery by IBM (and acquired Clearleap), and mobile development.
8. Single Page Application / “Native Web App”
7. Developing Economics of Open Source
The aforementioned Smart Open Source Movement is described as “an effort to stop the greed of corporations who use open source codes and make billions out of it while contributing nothing back to the community.” The assertion is that “software developers and programmers” are (“unintentionally”) “contributing to that greed of the corporate world.” The Smart Open Source License attempts to allow software to which it applies to only be used “free of charge” by “any person … [or] company NOT listed under NYSE, NASDAQ, DJIA, LSE, DAX, Shanghai Stock Exchange, Tokyo Stock Exchange, Hong Kong Stock Exchange and/or any company listed under Forbes 2000 Global list.” Although I understand the motivation of this movement, I see several obstacles to it being adopted and being successful. There are concepts in the license that are completely orthogonal to the concepts of “free speech” espoused by the Free Software Foundation. It also seems difficult to apply which companies are not allowed to use the software. Is the “end user” (client) company or companies not allowed to use the software or is it the development firm that is not allowed to use the software? For example, would a NYSE-listed company not be allowed to develop a product with the framework even if all their customers were not listed on any of the exchanges? Finally, most open source contributors are at least partially motivated by recognition and the pride of seeing their work used by as many people as possible.
We also saw the end of Codehaus and the end of Google Code hosting in 2015, replaced largely by GitHub. It seems like many (perhaps most) developers use open source but a much smaller percentage contributes to open source.
Recognition that Polygot Programming is Not a Silver Bullet
Despite the fact that certain languages fit better in certain circumstances and despite the fact that no language works best in all situations, developers cannot help but appreciate being able to use a single programming language they know well in very varied environments. Although polygot programming offers several benefits, there are potentially significant costs associated with all affected developers needing to learn to read, write, and maintain multiple languages. This is one of the explanations for many Java developers preferring to use Java throughout an enterprise application from client (“thick client” with Swing/JavaFX, Google Web Toolkit, Vaadin, DukeScript, JSweet, JavaServer Faces, etc.) through back-end (application server/Spring and JPA implementation).
I believe there are advantages associated with using new languages and learning from them and their different approaches, but I can also see that the cost to an enterprise can be great if a large number of programmers are required to learn and use a wide number of languages. Therefore, it’s not surprising that the enthusiasm for polygot programming seems to have reached a peak and is settling some now.
5. ECMAScript 2015 (6th Edition)
The DevOps concept continued to be a much discussed topic in software development in 2015. I really like the post ” How I Learned To Tune Out The DevOps Buzz: Don’t believe everything you hear” because blog author Chad Schorr (a self-described “DevOps evangelist”) articulates some of the concerns I’ve had regarding devops in practice: too much ambiguity and too many vendor-driven (self-serving) presentations on the concept. Also, my experience has proven that it’s often prudent to be skeptical of anything that its evangelists argue has all positives with no costs or downsides.
In many ways, DevOps seems to be going through the same lifecycle as Agile. The question is whether DevOps will enjoy the long-term relevance that Agile has had despite suffering from some of the same issues DevOps now faces. DevOps is likely to have positive long-term repercussions on how we write and deploy software, but I also anticipate that its rapid rise in adoption will be accompanied by a rapid rise in negative or disappointing experiences with it. In the end, the idea of development and operations being aligned more closely seems like an obviously positive thing, but we will probably realize that what works for one organization doesn’t always work the same for another organization and will have to learn how to implement DevOps differently in different cases. We definitely still need to get past what Mirco Hering articulates: the Dunning-Kruger effect currently frequently associated with DevOps.
Karthi Sadasivan has posted Top 5 Reasons Why Devops Will Transition Into Mainstream Strategy 2016 in which Sadasivan provides five reasons for agreeing with Gartner‘s expectations for DevOps to go mainstream in 2016.
It is next to impossible to bring up the front page of a general software development site such as DZone without seeing multiple blog and article titles mentioning Docker. In the article What is Docker and why is it so darn popular?, Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols writes that Docker “is hotter than hot because it makes it possible to get far more apps running on the same old servers and it also makes it very easy to package and ship programs.” It’s easy to explain the popularity of Docker, especially during the current emphasis on devops, given its numerous deployment-related benefits.
Clear back in January of 2015, Doug Dineley asked a good question, “But have we ever seen anything like Docker?”
The topic of microservices continues to dominate online software development blogs and articles in 2015. Microservices, defined by James Lewis and Martin Fowler as “an approach to developing a single application as a suite of small services, each running in its own process and communicating with lightweight mechanisms,” are touted for several benefits including ability to modularize services for different teams to implement, ability to use different technologies in different services, and the ability to make pieces of functionality less dependent on each other for deployment and execution. However, microservices, like all architectural styles, involve trade-offs and have costs. One of the most popular discussion points related to microservices is discussing how they differ from Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA). This is not all that surprising given that both architectural styles do share several characteristics and both SOA and microservices have enjoyed significant hype in the industry.
1. Software Security and Software Outages
I would like to change things up a bit and have software security issues and dysfunction not be a top development in software development for the year (#1 in 2014, #2 in 2013 with technical dysfunction as #1, and #2 in 2012), but the frequent and significant losses that are associated with software prevent me from lowering this on my list. Issues related to software security and outages in 2015 include felony charges for eighth grade computer hacker, the hacking and exposing of data from Ashley Madison, hacking of Experian data related to 15 million people (including T-Mobile customers), U.S. presidential campaign intrigue, the rapid rise of ransom ware, more Java and Flash vulnerabilities, the Apache Commons exposed Java deserializability issue, and the hacking of data of over 20 million people in the Office of Personnel Management.
A good way to quickly realize how much of a problem hacking has been in recent years, refer to The New York Times‘s How Many Times Has Your Personal Information Been Exposed to Hackers? This interactive site allows the user to select organizations he or she has had data associated with in recent years to get an idea how many times his or her data was potentially hacked. Craig Lowell‘s post Sorting Through the Wreckage of Last Week’s Outages calls 2015 “the year of the outage.”
There are always more noteworthy developments in software development than can be captured in a top ten list. This “honorable mention” section highlights other major developments that occurred in 2015 but just missed my top ten list.
The interest in Big Data remained strong and perhaps got much stronger in 2015. Bernard Marr provides a month-by-month summary of highs and lows of Big Data in Big Data: 12 Amazing Highs And Lows Of 2015. Microsoft obviously believes Big Data is a big deal as it acquired Revolution Analytics (“a major commercial distributor of the R statistical programming language“) in 2015.
As mentioned earlier in my discussion on economics of open source, GitHub has already essentially strong-armed the Codehaus and Google Code public repositories out of existence by sheer rapid rise in its popularity and use by developers. Code is not the only thing being made available on GitHub; books, design documents, and various other documents and artifacts are also being “open sourced” on GitHub. There is even a software developer recruiting post titled “How to: Use GitHub to Find Super-Talented Developers” and Yegor Bugayenko has gone as far as stating, “…if your GitHub profile is not full of projects and commits, your “value” as a software developer is low…” (see the blog post for full context).
The Node.js Foundation was created in 2015 as a collaboration involving the merging of Node.js and forked (2014) io.js code bases and managing future work in a “neutral” forum. The Node.js Foundation is hosted by the Linux Foundation.
Emil Protalinski has written that “Google confirms next Android version will use Oracle’s open-source OpenJDK for Java APIs.” Protalinski adds, “Google is replacing its implementation of the Java application programming interfaces (APIs) in Android with OpenJDK, the open source version of Oracle’s Java Development Kit (JDK). … Google confirmed to VentureBeat that Android N will rely on an OpenJDK implementation, rather Android’s own implementation of the Java APIs.”
In Analysis: Google Moving to OpenJDK, What That Really Means, Shai Almog provides some insightful analysis of the announcement that Android is replacing Harmony libraries with OpenJDK libraries and writes, “This is amazing news and a huge step forward for Java.” Abel Avram writes in Android Will Use the OpenJDK that “Android makes extensive use of the Java language and several libraries, the latter being based on the retired Apache Harmony project” (Apache Harmony was retired to the Apache Attic in late 2011).
Mitch Pronschinske also cited the breaking news and has written, “Google has already contributed to the OpenJDK in the past, and they plan to make more contributions in the future as they transition fully to OpenJDK within Android. The effect of this change on the Java community could be significant, since many more developers will be familiar with Android’s libraries. The OpenJDK is much more familiar to the wider Java community than Google’s Harmony-based libraries.”
Other 2015 Java-Related Developments
2015 was the year in which Java saw its developers adopting Java 8 with its lambda expressions and streams. As these approaches became more commonplace, we began to see more evidence of performance and other implications of using lambda expressions and streams. Java 9 and its flagship feature (Java modularization with Project Jigsaw) were postponed until 2017 and there was significant consternation associated with Oracle allegedly eliminating or at least trimming its Java evangelism team. See Java in 2015 – Major happenings for more details on what happened in Java in 2015.
Angular.js has enjoyed a rapid rise in popularity and usage in the web and mobile development worlds. Therefore, it’s hardly surprising that Angular 2 is earning significant coverage and even controversy as its release approaches. The beta release of Angular 2 occurred in mid-December of 2015.
TypeScript enjoyed a highly successful 2015. In this single year, TypeScript saw the release of TypeScript 1.4 (January), TypeScript 1.5 Alpha (March), TypeScript 1.5 Beta (April), TypeScript 1.5 (huge release in July), TypeScript 1.6 Beta (September, with support for React/JSX), TypeScript 1.6 (September), TypeScript 1.6 (September), TypeScript 1.7 (November), and TypeScript 1.7.5 (December). TypeScript 1.5 included features specifically designed with Angular 2 in mind and it was announced that Angular 2 is built on TypeScript. It also appears that this means the end of AtScript.
Kotlin 1.0 Beta, Kotlin 1.0 Beta 2, Kotlin 1.0 Beta 3, and Kotlin 1.0 Beta 4 were released in 2015. The Kotlin Eclipse Plugin 0.5.0 was also released in 2015. Kotlin is described on its homepage as, “Statically typed programming language for the JVM, Android and the browser.” Joseph Hager writes that “Kotlin is leading the pack of new JVM languages in the mobile space these days.”
Groovy was dropped by Pivotal in early 2015, but has since joined the Apache Software Foundation. The final funded Pivotal versions were Groovy 2.4 and Grails 3.0. Groovy 2.4 provides Android support.
C# and .NET
C# 6.0 was released in 2015 and “ships with Visual Studio 2015“. C# 6.0 includes several new features that Mark Michaelis writes will “change the way you write C# code in specific scenarios.” C# 6.0 was released in conjunction with .NET Framework 4.6, F# 4, Visual Basic 14, and Visual Studio 2015.
Swift 2.0 was announced and, perhaps even more significantly, was open sourced. The site Swift.org contains more details on open sourced Swift. Swift-related source code can be found in Apple’s GitHub repository.
Ruby and Ruby on Rails
In the article The state of Ruby and Rails: Opportunities and obstacles, Serdar Yegulalp writes about the current state of Ruby and Ruby on Rails with mention of the positives and the challenges. Yegulalp has also written Ruby on Rails takes on Node.js with WebSocket support, API mode where he highlights the recent release of Rails 5.0.0 beta 1. Rails 5 will only work on Ruby 2.2.2 (also released in 2015) or later so that the newest version of Rails can take advantage of Ruby 2.2 features and performance improvements and incorporate the Ruby OpenSSL Hostname Verification fix. Ruby 2.3.0 has since been released in 2015.
Perl 6 has been in the making for 15 years and 2015 is when it has finally arrived. More specifically, the beta version of the Rakudo implementation of Perl 6 was released in November and . In the Perl 6 Advent Calendar post “Christmas is here.“, Coke announces the “Christmas release (December 2015) of Rakudo Perl 6 #94 ‘коледа'” and adds that “Rakudo is an implementation of Perl 6 on the Moar Virtual Machine.”
The post 2015.52: Closer and closer to the Release provides a sense of urgency at which development of the Perl 6 specification is being conducted for a “Christmas 2015” release. Paul Krill‘s Developers can unwrap Perl 6 on Christmas quotes a recent Larry Wall e-mail message, “Christmas is still the plan [for release], though of course in some cultures that lasts till January 6 or so. We’re just trying to nail down as many loose ends as possible before release.” The Krill article also briefly looks at how Perl 6 shares some concepts with Perl 5, but is also fundamentally different (and incompatible) in other ways with Perl 5.
From my perspective the “other” language that has seemingly the greatest impact on Perl’s future is Python. Python continues to enjoy a long-running surge in popularity. In 2015, Python experienced several new versions including Python 3.4.3 (February), Python 3.5.0a3 (March), Python 2.7.10 and Python 2.7.10 RC 1 (May), Python 3.5.0b2 (June), Python 3.5.0b3 (July), Python 3.5.0 RC 1 (August), Python 3.5.0 RC 3 (September), Python 3.5.0 RC 4 (September), Python 3.5.0 (September), Python 2.7.11 RC 1 (November), Python 2.7.11 (December), and Python 3.5.1 and Python 3.4.4 RC 1 (December).
U.S. Web Design Standards
The U.S. Web Design Standards (Alpha) were released in the summer of 2015. The purpose of this site is advertised as “Open source UI components and visual style guide to create consistency and beautiful user experiences across U.S. federal government websites.” The site includes a Visual Style Guide, User Interface Components Standards, and examples of the principle and standards espoused on the site.
Josh Long‘s post This Year in Spring – December 29, 2015 outlines significant events in 2015 in the Spring/Pivotal world. These include Spring Cloud 1.0.0, Spring Cloud Data Flow, Spring Boot 1.3.0, and other cloud-related products. It was also announced that Spring Framework 5.0 will be delayed because “Spring 5 is designed to track JDK 9 very closely” and therefore cannot occur until after JDK 9 (which was delayed) is available.
Resurgence of the “Browser Wars”
With the web browser being a ubiquitous deployment environment common to desktops, laptops, and mobile devices, it’s not too surprising that competition in the browser space appears to be heating up again. Jack Wallen has written in “Mozilla jettisons everything but the browser” that “Mozilla has officially announced it will cease work on Firefox OS and wants to split off Thunderbird so they can focus on one thing and one thing only. Firefox.” Microsoft released Microsoft Edge as a replacement for the much maligned Internet Explorer with Windows 10 installations. The Vivaldi browser, created by developers associated with Opera, looks promising and is currently in beta.
Browsers compete on a wide variety of features and characteristics including performance, security, supported media types, and supported platforms. It will be interesting to see how renewed competition continues to help browsers move forward in all of these areas. Speaking of browsers and security, even with browsers locking down plugins (NPAPI) and favoring native HTML5, security issues still persist with plugins.
A choice of a favorite web browser is obviously a matter of taste and is subject to what a given person finds most important in a web browser. With all this stated, I found Mark Hachman‘s summary of how “five modern browsers” (Chrome, Opera, Firefox, Edge, and Internet Explorer) were compared to be interesting.
Progressive Web Apps
A concept that seems to be rapidly gaining popularity in late 2015 is Progressive Web Apps. Some good introductory resources related to this include Progressive Web Apps: Escaping Tabs Without Losing Our Soul, What Progressive Web Apps Mean for the Web, and Progressive Web Apps: ready for primetime.
2015 was another year full of major developments in software development and this post covers some of these major events at a very high level. Although I am publishing this post on the final day of 2015, I may add some other items, details, or links as I think of them or run across them in the next several days or even weeks to form a more complete picture of the major events in software development in 2015. 2015 was another great year for software developers and, if we’re not careful, the availability of programming languages, tools, frameworks, and documentation of successful practices could lead us to developing our own cases of the software developer version “affluenza.”
|Reference:||Significant Software Development Developments of 2015 from our JCG partner Dustin Marx at the Inspired by Actual Events blog.|