Featured FREE Whitepapers

What's New Here?

java-logo

Java Concurrency with ReadWriteLock

Writing multithreaded java applications is not a piece of cake. Extra care must be taken because bad synchronization can bring your application to its knees. The JVM heap is shared by all the threads. If multiple threads need to use the same objects or static class variables concurrently, thread access to shared data must be carefuly managed. Since version 1.5, utility classes commonly useful in concurrent programming is included in the JSDK. In Java synchronized keyword is used to acquire a exclusive lock on an object. When a thread acquires a lock of an object either for reading or writing, other threads must wait until the lock on that object is released. Think of a scenerio that there are many reader threads that reads a shared data frequently and only one writer thread that updates shared data. It’s not necessary to exclusively lock access to shared data while reading because multiple read operations can be done in parallel unless there is a write operation. In this post i’ll give an example usage of ReadWriteLock interface which is introduced in the Java 1.5 API Doc. In Java Api Documentation it says :  A ReadWriteLock maintains a pair of associated locks, one for read-only operations and one for writing. The read lock may be held simultaneously by multiple reader threads, so long as there are no writers. The write lock is exclusive. Reader threads can read shared data simultaneously. A read operation does not block other read operations. This is the case when you execute an SQL SELECT statement. But write operation is exclusive. This means all readers and other writers are blocked when a writer thread holds the lock for modifing shared data. Writer.java This class represents a thread that updates shared data. Writer uses WriteLock of ReadWriteLock to exclusively lock access to dictionary. package deneme.readwritelock; public class Writer extends Thread{ private boolean runForestRun = true; private Dictionary dictionary = null; public Writer(Dictionary d, String threadName) { this.dictionary = d; this.setName(threadName); } @Override public void run() { while (this.runForestRun) { String [] keys = dictionary.getKeys(); for (String key : keys) { String newValue = getNewValueFromDatastore(key); //updating dictionary with WRITE LOCK dictionary.set(key, newValue); } //update every seconds try { Thread.sleep(1000); } catch (InterruptedException e) { e.printStackTrace(); } } } public void stopWriter(){ this.runForestRun = false; this.interrupt(); } public String getNewValueFromDatastore(String key){ //This part is not implemented. Out of scope of this artile return "newValue"; } }Reader.java This class represents a thread that reads share data. package deneme.readwritelock; public class Reader extends Thread{ private Dictionary dictionary = null; public Reader(Dictionary d, String threadName) { this.dictionary = d; this.setName(threadName); } private boolean runForestRun = true; @Override public void run() { while (runForestRun) { String [] keys = dictionary.getKeys(); for (String key : keys) { //reading from dictionary with READ LOCK String value = dictionary.get(key); //make what ever you want with the value. System.out.println(key + " : " + value); } //update every seconds try { Thread.sleep(1000); } catch (InterruptedException e) { e.printStackTrace(); } } } public void stopReader(){ this.runForestRun = false; this.interrupt(); } }Dictionary.java This is a simple and thread safe dictionary. Read operations are managed through ReadLock and write operations (updates) are managed throuh WriteLock. package deneme.readwritelock; import java.util.HashMap; import java.util.concurrent.locks.Lock; import java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantReadWriteLock; public class Dictionary { private final ReentrantReadWriteLock readWriteLock = new ReentrantReadWriteLock(); private final Lock read = readWriteLock.readLock(); private final Lock write = readWriteLock.writeLock(); private HashMap<String, String> dictionary = new HashMap<String, String>(); public void set(String key, String value) { write.lock(); try { dictionary.put(key, value); } finally { write.unlock(); } } public String get(String key) { read.lock(); try{ return dictionary.get(key); } finally { read.unlock(); } } public String[] getKeys(){ read.lock(); try{ String keys[] = new String[dictionary.size()]; return dictionary.keySet().toArray(keys); } finally { read.unlock(); } } public static void main(String[] args) { Dictionary dictionary = new Dictionary(); dictionary.set("java", "object oriented"); dictionary.set("linux", "rulez"); Writer writer = new Writer(dictionary, "Mr. Writer"); Reader reader1 = new Reader(dictionary ,"Mrs Reader 1"); Reader reader2 = new Reader(dictionary ,"Mrs Reader 2"); Reader reader3 = new Reader(dictionary ,"Mrs Reader 3"); Reader reader4 = new Reader(dictionary ,"Mrs Reader 4"); Reader reader5 = new Reader(dictionary ,"Mrs Reader 5"); writer.start(); reader1.start(); reader2.start(); reader3.start(); reader4.start(); reader5.start(); } }Reference: ReadWriteLock example in Java from our JCG partner Ilkin Ulas at the All your base are belong to us blog....
json-logo

JSON with GSON and abstract classes

I have switched to Google Gson after many years of using org.json library for supporting JSON data interchange format in Java. org.json is a lower-level library, so that you have to create JSONObject, JSONArray, JSONString, … and do other low-level work. Gson simplifies this work. It provides simple toJson() and fromJson() methods to convert arbitrary Java objects to JSON and vice-versa, supports Java Generics, allows custom representations for objects, generates compact and readability JSON output and has many other goodies. I love it more and more. The using is simple. Assume, we have a class called Circle. public class Circle { private int radius = 10; private String backgroundColor = "#FF0000"; private String borderColor = "#000000"; private double scaleFactor = 0.5; ...// getter / setter }Serialization (Java object –> JSON) can be done as follows: Circle circle = new Circle(); Gson gson = new Gson(); String json = gson.toJson(circle); ==> json is { "radius": 10, "backgroundColor": "#FF0000", "borderColor": "#000000", "scaleFactor": 0.5, ... }Deserialization (JSON –> Java object) is just one line of code: Circle circle2 = gson.fromJson(json, Circle.class); ==> circle2 is the same as the circle aboveEverything works like a charm. There is only one problem I have faced with abstract classes. Assume, we have an abstract class AbstractElement and many other classes extending this one public abstract class AbstractElement { private String uuid;// getter / setter }public class Circle extends AbstractElement { ... }public class Rectangle extends AbstractElement { ... }public class Ellipse extends AbstractElement { ... }Assume now, we store all concrete classes in a list or a map parametrized with AbstractElement public class Whiteboard { private Map<String, AbstractElement> elements = new LinkedHashMap<String, AbstractElement>(); ... }The problem is that the concrete class is undisclosed during deserialization. It’s unknown in the JSON representation of Whiteboard. How the right Java class should be instantiated from the JSON representation and put into the Map<String, AbstractElement> elements? I have nothing found in the documentation what would address this problem. It is obvious that we need to store a meta information in JSON representations about concrete classes. That’s for sure. Gson allows you to register your own custom serializers and deserializers. That’s a power feature of Gson. Sometimes default representation is not what you want. This is often the case e.g. when dealing with third-party library classes. There are enough examples of how to write custom serializers / deserializers. I’m going to create an adapter class implementing both interfaces JsonSerializer, JsonDeserializer and to register it for my abstract class AbstractElement. GsonBuilder gsonBilder = new GsonBuilder(); gsonBilder.registerTypeAdapter(AbstractElement.class, new AbstractElementAdapter()); Gson gson = gsonBilder.create();And here is AbstractElementAdapter: package com.googlecode.whiteboard.json;import com.google.gson.*; import com.googlecode.whiteboard.model.base.AbstractElement; import java.lang.reflect.Type;public class AbstractElementAdapter implements JsonSerializer<AbstractElement>, JsonDeserializer<AbstractElement> { @Override public JsonElement serialize(AbstractElement src, Type typeOfSrc, JsonSerializationContext context) { JsonObject result = new JsonObject(); result.add("type", new JsonPrimitive(src.getClass().getSimpleName())); result.add("properties", context.serialize(src, src.getClass()));return result; }@Override public AbstractElement deserialize(JsonElement json, Type typeOfT, JsonDeserializationContext context) throws JsonParseException { JsonObject jsonObject = json.getAsJsonObject(); String type = jsonObject.get("type").getAsString(); JsonElement element = jsonObject.get("properties");try { return context.deserialize(element, Class.forName("com.googlecode.whiteboard.model." + type)); } catch (ClassNotFoundException cnfe) { throw new JsonParseException("Unknown element type: " + type, cnfe); } } }I add two JSON properties – one is ” type” and the other is ” properties”. The first property holds a concrete implementation class (simple name) of the AbstractElement and the second one holds the serialized object itself. The JSON looks like { "type": "Circle", "properties": { "radius": 10, "backgroundColor": "#FF0000", "borderColor": "#000000", "scaleFactor": 0.5, ... } }We benefit from the ” type” property during deserialization. The concrete class can be instantiated now by Class.forName(“com.googlecode.whiteboard.model.” + type) where “com.googlecode.whiteboard.model.” + type is a fully qualified class name. The following call public <T> T deserialize(JsonElement json, Type typeOfT) throws JsonParseExceptionfrom JsonDeserializationContext invokes default deserialization on the specified object and completes the job. Reference: JSON with GSON and abstract classes from our JCG partner Oleg Varaksin at the Thoughts on software development blog....
software-development-2-logo

Why Developers Keep Making Bad Technology Choices

Today, software developers are faced with a great abundance of options when choosing how to design and implement systems. We are constantly bombarded with choice and are used to dealing with buzzwords like NoSQL, the cloud, REST, Map-Reduce and so on. However, developers in charge of designing systems can be easily seduced into incorporating technologies that don’t provide a clear benefit over simpler solutions that aren’t as modern or hip. It seems like the KISS principle (Keep it simple, stupid!), while often referenced, is often neglected in favour of more “enterprisey” solutions. Why is this? There are probably a lot of reasons, but I’ve identified a few that I think cover the majority of cases. As professional developers, I feel strongly that we have a duty to our employers to provide the best long-term solutions and therefore we need to rein in our desires when they conflict with this. Software development is not yet in the same realm as medicine or engineering, but I think we do need to make steps towards the professionalism, duty and responsibility that come with working in those fields. Reason #1 – Boredom Developers are often solving the same types of problems over and over. Not all of us have the privilege of working on new types of projects all the time, and even if we are, it’s often not new ground; similar problems have usually been solved thousands of times before by software developers around the globe. It’s no surprise then that we want to try something new, even if we’ve adequately solved a problem before. We are natural puzzle solvers, and sometimes you just want to try a new puzzle. I’m sure many of you with several years of experience have seen functional systems effectively replaced with a new implementation that uses different technologies for no clear reason other than to suit the fancy of new developers. So what do we do about this? How do we scratch that itch for something new? A relational DB is just so boring compared to trying out the latest NoSQL platform. Who cares if we don’t really have a good use for it? Well, I’d say you have a few options. For example, take the initiative and find ways to build out the platform that might actually benefit from some new technology. Other than that, why not work on a pet project in your spare time? After all, our job is to deliver high quality software – not entertain ourselves. Disclaimer: I’m not trying to dissuade anyone from using new technologies. Just identify their benefits and see if they are the best choice for what you are doing, and if what you have doesn’t do the job, go for it! Reason #2 – Resume Padding This is perhaps the saddest of the reasons why developers make poor technology choices, and it mainly affects organizations with poor decision-making processes, but it’s still very common. Contracts and positions in software development are very fluid these days – it’s not uncommon for a developer to be at a new company every year or two. Gone are the days where hopping from job to job is considered a no-no. Since this is the case, a lot of developers leap-frog from position to position to climb the ladder. It’s far easier for an average or lower-skilled developers to get ahead by doing this instead of trying to move up within a single company. Since this is the case, developers will often try to incorporate technologies to get experience in them so as to add a bullet-point to their resume. How useful the technology will be to the platform is of secondary importance. Often it doesn’t matter how much they actually use it – nobody can pretend that people don’t exaggerate their skills when looking for new work. Therefore, platforms from small to large will often end up using untested technologies, or just technologies that nobody in-house actually understands well. Companies are then left with poor systems using too many technologies with nobody to maintain them as developers jump ship to more promising positions. I don’t believe that most developers do this, but those of us who disagree with such actions should work to push back when presented with developers who are trying to make bad choices. Reason #3 – Peer Pressure Peer pressure is perhaps the most difficult cause to resist. We all like to believe that we are independent agents that make our own informed decisions, but all of us are human, and event the most prickly people are social creatures that want to have a happy social group. When faced with new or hip technologies, a lot of us are somewhat afraid to resist implementing something that doesn’t really seem like a good idea to us. But we should suppress this feeling as much as we can. If you are in an environment where discussion and disagreement are valued (as one would hope), you should feel free to voice your concerns even if you aren’t totally familiar with the latest-and-greatest. Remember that software technologies come and go, but the basic principles pretty much stay the same. So if something doesn’t seem to add up, speak up! If you are a junior developer, you should still feel free to add your input – having experience doesn’t make one right. Plus, you could very well gain some insight into the choices that are being made. Reason #4 – Lack of Understanding Finally, technologies are sometimes chosen because developers don’t understand how things are actually working in a platform, or don’t want to find out. For example, if you don’t have experience with highly performant relational databases, you may be inclined to go the NoSQL route, out of fear that you may implement something that won’t scale. Often though, this fear can be unfounded. If you are using a tool improperly, of course it won’t work well. But don’t let lack of understanding or knowledge force you into an unwise course of action. If, in reality, a solution could be implemented well in a relational database, and your platform already uses one, it would be foolish to introduce a new dependency simply because you aren’t familiar with what you have. To avoid this, read and learn! If you are making choices, examine your assumptions and see if they hold up. Consult with senior developers who have worked with the tools in question and ask specifics about what they can and can’t do well. It’s never a waste to learn more about the tools that are available to us, and it will very likely pay dividends well into the future if you take the initiative. Reason #5 – Misunderstanding or Solving Non-Existent Problems This point ties into my previous point a little bit, but it really deserves its own discussion since it is such a big problem. A common theme when developers pitch a new technology is that it does X and Y and protects against Z. But a lot of the time, X, Y and Z were never issues in the first place. For example, if we have a read-only data set that needs to be cached on multiple nodes in a cluster, someone may pitch a caching technology that offers distributed data sets where elements are not duplicated on each node. But what if the data set is small and we don’t anticipate any change that would necessitate distributed caching? We’d be introducing new technology that is inherently slower, more brittle and more complicated for a problem that doesn’t exist! To guard against this, developers need to make sure that they understand the problem domain all the way through, and they also need to cross-check their assumptions to make sure they are correct. Sometimes we assume things that actually aren’t the case, so the latter step is important. Avoid the temptation to cover “what-if” situations. Chances are, you ain’t gonna need it, and if you do, we usually overestimate the cost of making changes at a later date, not realizing we are basically committing to the same effort now to avoid a slim chance of having to do the same amount of work later. So What Should We Do? So what are the rights things to do when choosing technologies? To start with, you might want to review the following points, and try to make it a team decision. The more input you have, the less likely you are to miss a piece of information that might alter your decision.Review the requirements – consistency, failover, performance, etc. Evaluate if what you have can meet the need well. If so, this is almost always the right choice. Investigate how other technologies would meet the need, and factor in the costs of extra dependencies and potential failure points (nothing is free, and every new technology can have significant maintenance costs). Find out your team’s expertise – favour things that you know well. Factor in any other concerns like pricing, timelines, etc. Discuss with the team, and make a pros and cons list.These are just guidelines, and you can approach it any way you like, because the main thing is that you do make the decision carefully and rationally. I hope that nobody takes this article to mean that new technologies are scary or that they should just be avoided! For instance, I’ve used NoSQL as an example already. I believe it definitely fills a need that exists and I’ve used it before to solve specific problems, but sometimes I think we get caught up in the fun stuff, and forget our ultimate goals. Just keep your objectives in mind and try to make the best long-term choice. Reference: Why Developers Keep Making Bad Technology Choices from our JCG partner Craig Flichel at the Carfey Software Blog blog....
apache-camel-logo

SOA example application

SOA describes a set of patterns for creating loosely coupled, standards-based business-aligned services that, because of the separation of concerns between description, implementation, and binding, provide a new level of flexibility. Service Oriented Architecture terminology has spread in recent years, at least among people who were involved in most of the Information Technology activities. The guidelines suggested by this methodology are granted as major factors to succeed in different distributable systems domains. Just as the definition is clear and easy to understand, so is its implementation into a real project, being intuitive, concise and elegant. I have released an application demonstrating how SOA?s principles can be applied into a small project making use of EIP (Enterprise Integration Pattern), IoC (Inversion of Control), and a building tool and scripting language such as Groovy. I analized a simple business case: an entertainment provider who wanted to dispatch rewards and bonuses to some of its customers, depending on customer service?s subscriptions. The process sequence is simple:  It is required to provide an implementation of a RewardsService. The service accepts as input a customer account number and a portfolio containing channels subscriptions.The Customer Status team is currently developing the EligibilityService which accepts the account number as an input. I set up an infrastructure to write acceptance tests for this first meaningful feature. This is what could be defined as a ?walking skeleton,? a prototype with the essential aspect that it could be built, deployed and tested after being easily downloaded from Github.RewardService is invoked by the client and it calls, in turn, the eligibility service whichhowever, in this case is not implemented. As many real scenarios expect external services, this proof-of-concept refers the eligibility service to a black-box, where only request/response interface is known. The unit testsimulates the eligibility servicebehaviorsmocking the end-point through the Camel Testing Framework. However, if you want to run the application on your local machineI set up, within a line of code, a faux eligibility service that merelyreturns a positive response: def alwaysEligible = {exchange -> if(exchange){exchange.getOut().setBody('CUSTOMER_ELIGIBLE')}} as Processor The entry point is an HTTP Restful interface built upon the Apache CXF, and is easily set up within few lines in theconfiguration. CXF is initialized by Spring in this following way: jaxrs.'server'(id:'restService',address:'http://${http.host}:${http.port}') {jaxrs.'serviceBeans'{ ref(bean:'rewardService')} } Services are connected by Apache Camel. RewardService contains only the reference of the ESB context – an instance of ProducerTemplate. Such solution allows a complete separation between the linking system and the business services.The Camel context represents the SOA’s wiring, and is configured through a DSL as in the example below: from('direct:rewards').to(eligibilityServiceEndpoint) Reference: SOA example application from our JCG partner Giancarlo Frison at the Making Things Simple Through The Complex blog....
codehaus-jetty-logo

Setting up JNDI with Jetty (Embedded)

I was running embedded Jetty on my developmentwork-space saving some time on vicious cycle of compiling and deployment. I have not worked with Jetty much and the ease of use made me hook on to it. I was in need to setup JNDI in order to retrieve a connection pool for my database related activities. Though there were comprehensive documentation in some places, most were scattered. So this post is intended to be your one stop place for the requirement of setting up JNDI with Jetty. If it does not, please do leave a comment and i will be glad to help you out. So starting off, first let us see how to setup Jetty to run as an embedded server. The folder structure of my eclipse project is as follows;The etc folder will consist of all the configuration files required by jetty. You can download jetty from here. For this example i have usedjetty-6.1.26. Include the following jars from the given folder locations;lib jetty-x.x.xx.jar, jetty-util-x.x.xx.jar,servlet-api-x.x.jarlib/plus jetty-plus-x.x.xx.jarlib/naming jetty-naming-x.x.xx.jarFor my example, i have set up mysql and therefore mysql-connector jar is also included in my library path. Copy all the files residing in your jetty installation’s etc directory to the etc directory of your eclipse project. In order to enable JNDI, we first need to include jetty-plus. There are many ways you can do this such as providing it as arun-timeargument, including it within your own jetty-env.xml residing in your WEB-INF or copying and pasting the required xml snippets from the jetty-plus.xml to your jetty.xml. I have chosen the latter. Hence, i have included the following snippet within my jetty.xml; <Array id="plusConfig" type="java.lang.String"> <Item>org.mortbay.jetty.webapp.WebInfConfiguration</Item> <Item>org.mortbay.jetty.plus.webapp.EnvConfiguration</Item> <Item>org.mortbay.jetty.plus.webapp.Configuration</Item> <Item>org.mortbay.jetty.webapp.JettyWebXmlConfiguration</Item> <Item>org.mortbay.jetty.webapp.TagLibConfiguration</Item> </Array><call name="addLifeCycle"> <arg> <new class="org.mortbay.jetty.deployer.WebAppDeployer"> <set name="contexts"><ref id="Contexts"></ref></set> <set name="webAppDir"><systemproperty default="." name="jetty.home">/webapps</systemproperty></set> <set name="parentLoaderPriority">false</set> <set name="extract">true</set> <set name="allowDuplicates">false</set> <set name="defaultsDescriptor"><systemproperty default="." name="jetty.home">/etc/webdefault.xml</systemproperty></set> <set name="configurationClasses"><ref id="plusConfig"></ref></set> </new> </arg> </call>Next up, you need to add the XML fragment related to your data-source into your jetty.xml. I have added the snippet required for mysql. For any other database, please check this link. <New id="myds" class="org.mortbay.jetty.plus.naming.Resource"><Arg>jdbc/MySQLDS</Arg> <Arg> <New class="com.mysql.jdbc.jdbc2.optional.MysqlConnectionPoolDataSource"> <Set name="Url">jdbc:mysql://localhost:3306/test</Set> <Set name="User">root</Set> <Set name="Password">password</Set> </New> </Arg> </New>Now that we have setup everything, all you need to do is run jetty in your embedded environment. Following code shows you how to run Jetty in the embedded mode as part of your main class; import java.io.File;import org.mortbay.jetty.Handler; import org.mortbay.jetty.Server; import org.mortbay.jetty.handler.DefaultHandler; import org.mortbay.jetty.handler.HandlerList; import org.mortbay.jetty.webapp.WebAppContext; import org.mortbay.xml.XmlConfiguration;public class JettyTest {public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception { Server jetty = new Server(); String[] configFiles = {"etc/jetty.xml"}; for(String configFile : configFiles) { XmlConfiguration configuration = new XmlConfiguration(new File(configFile).toURI().toURL()); configuration.configure(jetty); } WebAppContext appContext = new WebAppContext(); appContext.setContextPath("/myapp"); File rd = new File("path_to_your_war_file"); appContext.setWar(rd.getAbsolutePath()); HandlerList handlers = new HandlerList(); handlers.setHandlers(new Handler[]{ appContext, new DefaultHandler()}); jetty.setHandler(handlers); jetty.start(); } }Thats about it. Now you can look up your data-source which is exposed from Jetty. For ease, i have configured it with Spring’s JNDIObjectFactoryBean. One important aspect to note is the jndi provider URL and the initial context factory entries required for Jetty. <bean id="jndiTemplate" class="org.springframework.jndi.JndiTemplate"> <property name="environment"> <props> <prop key="java.naming.factory.initial">org.mortbay.naming.InitialContextFactory</prop> <prop key="java.naming.provider.url">org.mortbay.naming</prop> </props> </property> </bean> <bean id="jndiDataSource" class="org.springframework.jndi.JndiObjectFactoryBean"> <property name="jndiTemplate"> <ref bean="jndiTemplate"/> </property> <property name="jndiName"> <value>jdbc/MySQLDS</value> </property> </bean>With that you have all that you need to configure JNDI and access it through Spring’s JNDI template. One other thing i was interested in was remote debugging with jetty server. After some searching i found that you need to include the following in your runtime configuration as VM arguments; -Xdebug -Xnoagent -Xrunjdwp:transport=dt_socket,server=y,suspend=n,address=8000 This will enable you to remote debug your application on port 8000. If there are any queries please do leave a comment and i will be more than happy to help anyone. And ofcourse if you do see any error, leave a reply too which again is much appreciated :). Reference: Setting up JNDI with Jetty (Embedded) from our JCG partner Dinuka Arseculeratne at the My Journey Through IT blog....
javafx-logo

FXML: Custom components using BuilderFactory

When you want to use FXML, you will need to be able to add your own components. That’s fairly easy, you simply need to add an import statement. Elements in your FXML-file that start with a capital letter will be interpreted as instances, and if they’re Java Beans, most important: if they have a parameterless standard constructor, everything is fine. If not, it’s a bit more complicated. You will need to provide a Builder and a BuilderFactory to the loader. As an example, in FXExperience Tools a nice ColorPicker control is used, that needs a Color passed to it’s constructor. So in FXML we want to write something like this: <?import com.fxexperience.javafx.scene.control.colorpicker.ColorPicker?><!-- ... --><ColorPicker fx:id="colorPicker" id="colorPicker" color="GREEN" /> Now we need to create a BuilderFactory and a Builder: import com.fxexperience.javafx.scene.control.colorpicker.ColorPicker; import javafx.fxml.JavaFXBuilderFactory; import javafx.scene.paint.Color; import javafx.util.Builder; import javafx.util.BuilderFactory;/** * * @author eppleton */ public class ColorPickerBuilderFactory implements BuilderFactory {public static class ColorPickerBuilder implements Builder<ColorPicker> { private Color color = Color.WHITE; private String id="colorPicker";public String getId() { return id; }public void setId(String id) { this.id = id; }public Color getColor() { return color; }public void setColor(Color color) { this.color = color; }@Override public ColorPicker build() { ColorPicker picker = new ColorPicker(color); picker.setId(id); return picker; } } private JavaFXBuilderFactory defaultBuilderFactory = new JavaFXBuilderFactory();@Override public Builder<?> getBuilder(Class<?> type) { return (type == ColorPicker.class) ? new ColorPickerBuilder() : defaultBuilderFactory.getBuilder(type); } }And finally when loading the FXML you need to pass the factory to your loader: (Parent) FXMLLoader.load( TestTool.class.getResource("GradientEditorControl.fxml"), null, new ColorPickerBuilderFactory())That’s it, would be cool if I could make SceneBuilder understand that as well. Reference: Add custom components to FXML using BuilderFactoryfrom our JCG partner Toni Epple at the Eppleton blog....
software-development-2-logo

The Greatest Developer Fallacy Or The Wisest Words You’ll Ever Hear?

“I will learn it when I need it“! I’ve heard that phrase a lot over the years; it seems like a highly pragmatic attitude to foster when you’re in an industry as fast-paced as software development. On some level it actually IS quite pragmatic, but on another level I am annoyed by the phrase. It has become a mantra for our whole industry which hasn’t changed said industry for the better. The problem is this, in the guise of sounding like a wise and practical developer, people use it as an excuse to coast. There is too much stuff to know, it is necessary to be able to pick certain things up as you go along – part of the job. But, there is a difference between having to “pick up” some knowledge as you go along and doing absolutely everything just-in-time. The whole industry has become a bunch of generalists, maybe it has always been this way, I just wasn’t around to see it, either way I don’t like it. Noone wants to invest the time to learn anything really deeply, not computer science fundamentals, not the latest tech you’re working with, not even the language you’ve been coding in every day, for the last few years. Why bother, it will be replaced, superseded, marginalised and out of fashion before you’re half way done. I’ve discussed this with various people many times, but noone seems to really see it as a problem. “Just being pragmatic dude“. In the meantime we’ve all become clones of each other. You want a Java developer, I am a Java developer, you’re a Java developer, my neighbour is a Java developer. What differentiates us from each other – not much! Well, I’ve got some jQuery experience. That’s great, so you know how to build accordion menu then? Sure, I Google it and steal the best code I find :). In the meantime, if you need to hire a REAL expert (in anything, maybe you’re writing a fancy parser or need to visualise some big data), I hope you’ve stocked up on beer and sandwiches cause you’re gonna be here a while. Ok, there are ways to differentiate yourself, I have better communication skills, which is why I do better. That’s important too, but, developers differentiating themselves based on soft skills rather than developer skills – seems a bit twisted. We all communicate really well but the code is a mess :). Hell, I shouldn’t really talk, I am a bit of a generalist too. Of course I’d like to think of myself as a T-shaped individual, but if we’re completely honest, it’s more of a dash-shaped or underscore-shaped with maybe a few bumps :). To the uninitiated those bumps might look like big giant stalactites – T-shaped indeed. You seem like an expert without ever being an expert, just one advantage of being in a sea of generalists. Investing In Your Future I don’t want to preach about how we should all be investing in our professional future, everybody knows we should be. Most people probably think they are infact investing, they rock up to work, write a lot of code maybe even do some reading on the side, surely that must make them an expert in about 10 years, and a senior expert in 20 (I keep meaning to write more about this, one day I’ll get around to it :))? But, if that was the way, every old person would be an expert in a whole bunch of stuff and that is emphatically not the case. Maybe it is just that people don’t know how to build expertise (there is an element of truth to this), but I have a sneaking suspicion that it’s more about lack of desire rather than lack of knowledge. What was that saying about the will and the way – totally applicable in this case? I’ve gone completely off-track. “Investing in professional future” is just one of those buzzword things, the mantra is “I will learn it when I need it“. It was good enough for my daddy and it has served me well so far. Let’s apply this thinking to finance, “I will invest my money when I think I need the money“. Somehow it doesn’t quite have the same kind of pragmatic ring to it. You Don’t Know What You Don’t Know We’ve all had those moments where you’re going through major pain trying to solve a problem until someone comes along and tells you about algorithm X or technology Y and it makes everything fast and simple. It was lucky that person just happened to be there to show you the “easy” way, otherwise you would have spent days/weeks trying to figure it out and it would have been a mess. You can’t be blamed for this though, you don’t know what you don’t know. For me, this is where the “I will learn it when I need it” mentality falls over. You can’t learn something if you don’t know it exists. Google goes a long way towards mitigating this problem, but not all the way. There are plenty of problems you will encounter in the wild where you can beat your head against the wall ad infinitum unless you know what class of problem you’re looking at (e.g. if you know a bit about searching and constraint propagation, solving sudoku is easy, otherwise it’s really quite hard). You can’t learn about an algorithm if you’re not aware of it or its applicability. You can’t utilise a technology to solve a problem if you don’t even realise it has that capability. You’re not going to always have someone there to point you in the right direction. I am willing to bet there is a billion lines of code out there right now which can be replaced with a million lines of faster, cleaner, better code simply because whoever wrote it didn’t know what they didn’t know. I seem to be making a case for the opposite side here, if knowing what you don’t know is the ticket then surely we should be focusing on breadth of knowledge. Superficial awareness of as much stuff as possible should see us through, we’ll be able to recognise the problems when we see them and then learn what we need more deeply. Except it doesn’t work like that, skimming subjects doesn’t allow you to retain anything, our brain doesn’t work that way. If we don’t reinforce and dig deeper into the concepts we quickly page that information out as unimportant, it is a waste of time (think back to cramming for exams, how much do you remember the next day?). However if you focus on building deeper understanding of a subject – in an interesting twist – you will gain broad knowledge as well (which you will actually be able to retain). My grandad is a nuclear physicist, several decades of working to gain deeper knowledge of the subject has made him an expert, but it has also made him an excellent mathematician, a decent chemist, a pretty good geologist, a fair biologist etc. Just some empirical evidence that seeking depth leads to breadth as a side-effect. Can You Learn It Fast Enough Some stuff just takes a long time to learn. I am confident I can pick up an ORM framework I haven’t seen before without even breaking stride, I’ve used them before, the concepts are the same. But what if you need to do some speech to text conversion, not quite as simple, not enough background. Hopefully Google will have something for us to copy/paste. That was a bad example, only research boffins at universities need to do that crap. How about building a website then, we all know how to do that, but what if you need to do it for 10 million users a day. We just need to learn everything about scaling, I am sure the users will wait a month or two for us to get up to speed :). Yeah, I am just being stupid, all we need to do is hire an expert and … errr … oh wait, we’re all out of beer and sandwiches. Why Should I Care Working with experts is freaking awesome. You may have experienced it before, everything they say is something new and interesting, you learn new tricks with every line of code, you can almost feel your brain expanding :). You want to learn from the experts, so it’s really sad when you can’t find any. Since everyone is only learning when they “need it“, noone can teach anything to anyone. The chunk of wisdom here is this, you want to work with experts, but the experts also want to work with experts, so what are you doing to make sure the experts want to work with you? Being able to learn something when you need it is a good skill to have, but you can not let it be your philosophy as a developer. Yes it is a big industry you can’t learn everything, so pick something and make sure you know it backwards, if you’re curious enough to follow up on the interesting bits, you’ll find you have a decent grasp of a lot of other stuff at the end. And if you do a good enough job, other super-awesome-smart people are going to want to come and hang around you cause they’ll be able to learn something from you and you’ll be able to learn much from them. Everybody will be a winner. Reference: The Greatest Developer Fallacy Or The Wisest Words You’ll Ever Hear? from our JCG partner Alan Skorkin at the Skorks blog....
software-development-2-logo

Complex Event Processing – a beginner’s view

Using a Complex Event Processing is not so complex. Well, initially at least. A substantial amount of information is available on the web on CEP products and functionality. But,if you are like me, you want to test run a product/application with little patience for reading detailed documentation. So when I was evaluating CEP as an engine for one of our future products, I decided to just try it out using a business scenario I knew from my past experienceworking with afinancial company. For the impatient developers like me, what could be better than using a free and open source product. So, I decided to use ‘Esper’, an open source product based on Java and was able to write the code (merely 3 java classes) to address business case below. But first a little about CEP and a shameless plug of our product. My apologies. :-) Complex Event Processing has been gaining significant ground recently. The benefits of CEP are widely understood in some verticals such as financial and insurance industries, where it is actively deployed to perform various business critical tasks. Monitoring, Fraud detection and algorithmic trading are some of those critical tasks that depend on CEP to integrate multiple streams of real-time data, identify patterns and generate actionable events for an organization. My current employer, Sybase Inc is one of the leading suppliers of CEP. Aleri, the Sybase CEP product, is widely used in financial services industry and it is the main component of Sybase’s leading solution,’RAP – The Trading Edition’. Aleri is also sold as a separate product. Detailed information about the product is available here. http://www.sybase.com/products/financialservicessolutions/complex-event-processing. The high level architecture of a CEP application is shown in the diagram below.  Now on to the best part. The business requirement – The important aspect of CEP that fascinates me is its ability to co-relate events or data points from different streams or from within the same data stream. To elaborate, take an example of a retail bank that has a fraud monitoring system in place. The system flags every cash transaction over $10,000 for a manual review. What this means is a large cash transaction (a deposit or withdrawal) in an account raises the anti-money laundering event from the monitoring system. Such traditional monitoring systems can easily be circumvented /exploited by simple tricks such as depositing more than one check with smaller amounts. What happens if an account holder deposits 2 checks of $6000 in a day or 5 checks of $2500 in a day? Nothing. The system can’t catch it. The CEP provides a way to define rules with a time frame criterion. For example, you could specify a rule to raise a flag when some one deposits more than $10000 in cash in a 12 hour window. Get it? Follow the steps below to see how easy it is to implement CEP to meet this business requirement. Download latest Esper version (4.5.0 at the time of this writing) from here. http://espertech.com/download/ Unzip the package in a separate folder. Create a Java project and reference the Esper jar files from this folder. Create a standard java bean for an event – which here is an Deposit account with a name and amount attributes. package com.sybase.testTools.util;import com.espertech.esper.client.EventBean;public class DepositEvent { private String accountName; private int amount;public DepositEvent(String accountName, int amount) { this.accountName = accountName; this.amount = amount; }public String getAccountName() { return accountName; }public int getAmount() { return amount; } }The next listing is for creating an event type, the sql like query to create an event and to register a listener on that query. The code generates an event any time one of the two deposit accounts AccountA and AccountB is deposited with more than 100000 in a time frame of 10 seconds (this is where you specify the time window). Because this is just a test, I have put the event generation functionality together with other code, but in real life the deposit amounts wouldbe fedfrom deposit transaction processing system based on some messaging framework. The code is easy enough to follow. First we create the initial configuration. Then we add a type of event we want.A query with criterion for selecting the event is created next. As you can see the amount is summed up over sliding windows of 10 seconds and it creates an event when total of the amount in that time frame for a particular account exceeds 100000.A listener is created next and it is registered on the query. package com.sybase.testTools;import org.apache.log4j.BasicConfigurator;import com.espertech.esper.client.Configuration; import com.espertech.esper.client.EPServiceProvider; import com.espertech.esper.client.EPServiceProviderManager; import com.espertech.esper.client.EPStatement; import com.sybase.testTools.util.MyListener; import com.sybase.testTools.util.DepositEvent;public class EsperTest { public static void main(String args[]) { try { Configuration config = new Configuration();config.addEventType("DepositEvent", com.sybase.testTools.util.DepositEvent.class .getName()); EPServiceProvider epService = EPServiceProviderManager .getDefaultProvider(config); String expression = "select accountName, sum(amount) from com.sybase.testTools.util.DepositEvent.win:time(10 seconds)" + " group by accountName having sum(amount) > 100000";EPStatement statement = epService.getEPAdministrator().createEPL( expression); MyListener listener = new MyListener(); statement.addListener(listener); int amount = 0; for (int i = 0; i < 1000; i++) { amount = i; DepositEvent event; if (i % 2 == 0) { event = new DepositEvent("AccountA", amount); } else { event = new DepositEvent("AccountB", amount); } epService.getEPRuntime().sendEvent(event); }} catch (Exception e) { e.printStackTrace(); } } }The next listing is the listener. Every time an event is generated in the time window specified in the query, it gets added to the newEvents collection. package com.sybase.testTools.util;import com.espertech.esper.client.EventBean; import com.espertech.esper.client.UpdateListener;public class MyListener implements UpdateListener { public void update(EventBean[] newEvents, EventBean[] oldEvents) { try { if (newEvents == null) {return; } EventBean event = newEvents[0]; System.out.println("Account: " + event.get("accountName") + ", exceeded the sum, actual " + event.get("sum(amount)")); } catch (Exception e) { e.printStackTrace(); }}}Easy enough, right? The expression language itself is fairly easy to understand because of its similarities to standard SQL syntax. Although the real life implementation could become complex based on the type and number of feeds and events you want to monitor, the product in itself is simple enough to understand. Many of the commercial CEP products offer excellent user interface to create the type of events, queries and reports. Complex event processing is still a growing field and the pace of its adoptionwill only increase as companies try to make sense of all the streams of data flowing in. The amount of semi-structured and other type of data (audio, video) has already surpassed the amount of traditional relational data. It’s easy to gauge the impact of good CEP application at a time when stock trading companies are already gleaning clues from twit feeds from twitter. Reference: Complex Event Processing – a beginner’s view from our JCG partner Mahesh Gadgil at the Simple yet Practical blog....
software-development-2-logo

Being a better enterprise architect

Enterprise architects seem to become more and more involved in “trying out new things” or pushing down technology or implementation advice — nay dictation — without having a dog in the fight, or having to code any part of it. I’ve observed this in quite a few place, both working with the architects as a fellow architect, or as a developer. From these observations, I’ve come up with three rules for myself for being a good enterprise architect that I believe may be worthy for sharing and discussion. #1 Gain the respect of the developers I would like to generalize and say that developers seem to be the type of people who don’t want to put up with more bullshit than they absolutely have to. So trying the typical political maneuvering that you find in big companies to impress developers wont work. That includes salesmanship, power point presentations, etc. Those skills can be important for relaying a direction or vision, but it’s not going to impress the developers. The most tried and true way to gain their respect is to code with them. Yes, indeed. Good architects code. Bad ones pontificate. And there seem to be *way* more of the latter than the former. Coding your brilliantly “architected” solution will help gain their respect. But it also helps in another area. The second rule I follow. #2 Realize that you cannot design a system on paper. The source code is not the product that you’re engineering. The source code itself is the design. So when I sit in an architecture role, I remind myself that coming up with diagrams and flow visualizations is not the design. It’s a brainstorm to help develop a model in my head. But without putting that model to code, you don’t know how it will truly behave, or how the architected solution should be altered. And believe me. In almost all cases, it should be altered. In other words, there should be a feedback loop between the developers and the architects. And if you follow rule #1, you’ll be right there to observe first hand how your solution plays out in code. #3 Don’t resume build Don’t glom onto the latest and most shiny technology and push it onto the developers without putting it through some rigorous, real-life situations. Playing with new technology is fun. I do it all the time. But I do it outside of my day job. Sacrificing the stability of the team, the software, and the business model just because some technology seems cool and Google might hire you if you know it is not a respectable way to go about solving enterprise problems. Even if you’ve seen enough sales presentations about how this new technology is going to be such a magic bullet, resist the temptation to try to indoctrinate the rest of the team until you’ve put the new technology to real life software problems in an incubator. I’ve been on both sides of the fence, have worked with a bunch of good developers and architects, and these are my three rules. Anyone want to add anything? Reference: Being a better enterprise architect from our JCG partner Christian Posta at the Christian Posta Software blog....
apache-activemq-logo

What is ActiveMQ?

Although the Active MQ website already gives a pithy, to-the-point explanation of ActiveMQ, I would like to add some more context to their definition. From the ActiveMQ project’s website: “ActiveMQ is an open sourced implementation of JMS 1.1 as part of the J2EE 1.4 specification.” Here’s my take: ActiveMQ is an open-source, messaging software which can serve as the backbone for an architecture of distributed applications built upon messaging. The creators of ActiveMQ were driven to create this open-source project for two main reasons:The available existing solutions at the time were proprietary/very expensive Developers with the Apache Software Foundation were working on a fully J2EE compliant application server (Geronimo) and they needed a JMS solution that had a license compatible with Apache’s licensing.Since its inception, ActiveMQ has turned into a strong competitor of the commercial alternatives, such as WebSphereMQ, EMS/TIBCO and SonicMQ and is deployed in production in some of the top companies in industries ranging from financial services to retail. Using messaging as an integration or communication style leads to many benefits such as:Allowing applications built with different languages and on different operating systems to integrate with each other Location transparency – client applications don’t need to know where the service applications are located Reliable communication – the producers/consumers of messages don’t have to be available at the same time, or certain segments along the route of the message can go down and come back up without impacting the message getting to the service/consumer Scaling – can scale horizontallyby adding more services that can handle the messages if too many messages are arriving Asynchronous communication – a client can fire a message and continue other processing instead of blocking until the service has sent a response; it can handle the response message only when the message is ready Reduced coupling – the assumptions made by the clients and services are greatly reduced as a result of the previous 5 benefits. A service can change details about itself, including its location, protocol, and availability, without affecting or disrupting the client.Please see Gregor Hohpe’s description about messaging or the book he and Bobby Woolf wrote about messaging-based enterprise application integration. There are other advantages as well (hopefully someone can add other benefits or drawbacks in the comments), and ActiveMQ is a free, open-source software that can facilitate delivering those advantages and has proven to be highly reliable and scalable in production environments. Reference: What is ActiveMQ? from our JCG partner Christian Posta at the Christian Posta Software blog....
Java Code Geeks and all content copyright © 2010-2014, Exelixis Media Ltd | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Contact
All trademarks and registered trademarks appearing on Java Code Geeks are the property of their respective owners.
Java is a trademark or registered trademark of Oracle Corporation in the United States and other countries.
Java Code Geeks is not connected to Oracle Corporation and is not sponsored by Oracle Corporation.
Do you want to know how to develop your skillset and become a ...
Java Rockstar?

Subscribe to our newsletter to start Rocking right now!

To get you started we give you two of our best selling eBooks for FREE!

Get ready to Rock!
You can download the complementary eBooks using the links below:
Close