Sometimes our software projects need costly object creations (database connections, socket connections, large graphical objects etc.). This cost may be about time and/or memory. Those objects may also be needed to be created frequently. At that moment, Object/Resource Pool pattern comes to help.
Object Pool pattern:
- Reuses unused costly objects without re-creating those objects (e.g. books in a library).
- May create objects eagerly before they are needed, to manage application performance.
- May limit created number of objects to manage application performance and user access.
Client requests an object (Reusable) from object pool. Object pool has a list of predefined reusables and gives an available one from pool. For the client’s point of view, given reusable is a new object but it is probably (object creation strategies will be told later) a pre-created object with a new object’s field values. For the optimum performance, client should notify object pool when reusable is no longer needed. Just in case client doesn’t notify, object pool may define a timeout for each created reusable. Object pool must also have a synchronization mechanism for reusable serving, especially on multithreaded or multiuser applications.
When to use/Trade offs:
If objects are not costly, object pool pattern should not be used because this pattern needs clients to inform object pool (brings extra code complexity) and object creation management code (synchronization of pool, object creation limitation strategy etc.). This extra management code also brings a little performance loss. If performance gain of reusable object usage is bigger than extra management code performance loss, and application must frequently create those reusable objects, object pool pattern is recommended to be used.
Object pool limit:
- If memory is limited and/or maximum number of clients are needed to be restricted, an object number limit value may be defined for object pool (limited pool).
- If there is no restriction, limit value is not needed (unlimited pool).
- If all object pool list is in use, new objects may be created (expanding pool) or client may be enforced to waiting (fixed pool).
- If application startup is performed infrequently and startup time is not very important, object pool list objects may be created at the startup (eager ceration).
- If no restrictions exist, no objects are needed to be created eagerly (lazy creation).
- Some number of objects may be created eagerly, others may be created lazily according to the application parameters (mixed creation).
Empty object pool strategy:
- If object pool is expanding, create a new object and return it.
- If object pool is not expanding, return null or enforce client to wait until an object is ready to be given.
- Object pool should have a synchronization mechanism for object serving. Otherwise, especially on multiuser systems, pooling system may fail.
Unused object strategy:
- Usage of the pool objects may be lower than expected in some cases. Object pool may have a pool object removing strategy (i.e. descreasing object limit) for increasing performance.
Returning object strategy:
- Clients should return pool objects back to the pool after their job is completed. But pool code can’t control this and poor client code may return pool objects. For this situation, object pool may have a timer mechanism for given but unused pool objects.
According to the project requirements, some of those strategies or mixed versions should be selected and implemented for object pool. But “reusing available objects” principle is the key and can not be changed for any implementation strategy.
This guide will introduce you to the world of Software Architecture!
This 162 page guide will cover topics within the field of software architecture including: software architecture as a solution balancing the concerns of different stakeholders, quality assurance, methods to describe and evaluate architectures, the influence of architecture on reuse, and the life cycle of a system and its architecture. This guide concludes with a comparison between the professions of software architect and software engineer.