Home » Java » Core Java » Should Java be more high level or low level?

About Peter Lawrey

Should Java be more high level or low level?

Overview

Java 8 is bringing much antisipated features such as Lambda expressions, Type Annotations and Virtual Extensions. While this functionality is a) valuable, b) playing catch up with cooler languages, are these richer, higher level functionality the only area Java should be focused.
 
 
 
 
 

What are the most widely used languages

There are many ways to assess which are the most widely used languages. One index which attempts to consider a wide variety of sources is the Tiobe Index. The positions and ratings are taken from Jan 2013.

PositionProgramming LanguageRatingsAgeCoolerLevel
1C17.9%oldernolower (much)
2Java17.4%samenosame
3Objective-C10.3%oldernolower
4C++9.1%oldernolower
5C#6.2%neweryeslower (slightly)
6PHP5.5%olderyeshigher
7(Visual) Basic4.7%oldernosame?
8Python4.2%oldernohigher
9Perl2.3%oldernohigher
10JavaScript2.0%samenohigher
11Ruby1.8%olderyeshigher
12Visual Basic .NET1.0%newernohigher
13Lisp1.0%oldernohigher
14Pascal0.9%oldernosame
15Delphi/Object Pascal0.9%oldernohigher
16Ada0.7%oldernosame?
17MATLAB0.6%oldernohigher
18Lua0.6%olderyeshigher
19Assembly0.6%oldernolower (much)
20Bash0.6%oldernohigher

The “Age” is based on the initial release date, the “cooler” is purely subjective on my part, and the “Level” column is whether the language supports lower level functionality or is it designed to be more abstract/higher level.

What I take from this list that there are many higher level languages, but the really popular ones support lower level constructs. e.g. Java is the only one in the top 5 not to support structs directly. (It has an optimisation which can work aorund this to a small degree)

Conclusion

While Java should be looking to add higher level functionality, it should also consider the lower level features languages like the *C* languages support as these are likely to become more popular as there will be more mobile and embedded devices in the future.
 

Reference: Should Java be more high level or low level? from our JCG partner Peter Lawrey at the Vanilla Java blog.

Do you want to know how to develop your skillset to become a Java Rockstar?

Subscribe to our newsletter to start Rocking right now!

To get you started we give you our best selling eBooks for FREE!

1. JPA Mini Book

2. JVM Troubleshooting Guide

3. JUnit Tutorial for Unit Testing

4. Java Annotations Tutorial

5. Java Interview Questions

6. Spring Interview Questions

7. Android UI Design

and many more ....

One comment

  1. To be precise, all Java 8 will bring is “low level” compiler support for Type Annotations, there isn’t a single actual annotation nor Checker that will be part of JDK 8, that’s up to individual projects. So each “Pet Project” will have its “Pet Annotations”.

    The “Annotation Hell” already becomes obvious if you look at Null-checks. @Nullable competes with @NonNull, @NotNull, @CannotBeNull, @SholdNotBeNull and who knows how many other variations ;-/

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*


seven − 5 =

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Do you want to know how to develop your skillset and become a ...

Subscribe to our newsletter to start Rocking right now!

To get you started we give you our best selling eBooks for FREE!
Get ready to Rock!
To download the books, please verify your email address by following the instructions found on the email we just sent you.

THANK YOU!

Close