MANIFEST.MF and feature.xml versioning rules

I’m forever forgetting what the rules are for dependency declarations in MANIFEST.MF and feature.xml for osgi plugins and features. And Googling often results in frustration rather than an answer. So, because today I actually found a concise list of the rules, I thought I’d repost them here, with some minor edits to help clarify.

OSGi Plugin Version Ranges

Dependencies on bundles and packages have an associated version range which is specified using an interval notation: a square bracket “[” or “]” denotes an inclusive end of the range and a round bracket “(” or “)” denotes an exclusive end of the range. Where one end of the range is to be included and the other excluded, it is permitted to pair a round bracket with a square bracket. The examples below make this clear.

If a single version number is used where a version range is required this does not indicate a single version, but the range starting from that version and including all higher versions.

There are four common cases:

  • A “strict” version range, such as [1.2.3,1.2.3], which denotes that version and only that version. 
  • A “half-open” range, such as [1.2.3,2.0.0), which has an inclusive lower limit and an exclusive upper limit, denoting version 1.2.3 and any version after this, up to, but not including, version 2.0.0. 
  • An “unbounded” version range, such as 1.2.3, which denotes version 1.2.3 and all later versions.
  • No version range, which denotes any version will be acceptable. NOT RECOMMENDED

The complete text of the above snippet can be seen here (or here as PDF).


Require-Bundle: org.eclipse.core.runtime;bundle-version="[3.4.0,4.0.0)", org.eclipse.core.resources;bundle-version="[3.4.0,4.0.0)", org.eclipse.ui.ide;bundle-version="[3.4.0,4.0.0)", org.eclipse.ui.navigator;bundle-version="3.5.100",

See also:

In terms of feature manifest (feature.xml) rules, has pretty good documentation, but the most important thing to remember - and what I often have to look up - is how to state the matching rules for required upstream features & plugins. Experience says it's always better to state things explicitly so there's no downstream guesswork needed and anyone reading your manifest knows EXACTLY what version(s) are required for or compatible with your feature. Plus, while YOU might be using PDE UI to build, someone else might be using Tycho and Maven, and every tool can interpret missing metadata their own way.

When in doubt, spell it out.

Valid values and processing are as follows:

  • if version attribute is not specified, the match attribute (if specified) is ignored.
  • perfect - dependent plug-in version must match exactly the specified version. If "patch" is "true", "perfect" is assumed and other values cannot be set. [1.2.3,1.2.3]
  • equivalent - dependent plug-in version must be at least at the version specified, or at a higher service level (major and minor version levels must equal the specified version). [1.2.3,1.3)
  • compatible - dependent plug-in version must be at least at the version specified, or at a higher service level or minor level (major version level must equal the specified version). [1.2.3,2.0)
  • greaterOrEqual - dependent plug-in version must be at least at the version specified, or at a higher service, minor or major level. 1.2.3 

The complete text of the above snippet can be seen here.


  <import feature="org.eclipse.m2e.feature" version="1.0.0" match="compatible"/>
  <import feature="org.maven.ide.eclipse.wtp.feature" version="0.13.0" match="greaterOrEqual"/>
  <plugin id="ch.qos.logback.classic" version="0.9.27.v20110224-1110" match="greaterOrEqual"/>
  <plugin id="ch.qos.logback.core" version="0.9.27.v20110224-1110" match="greaterOrEqual"/>
  <plugin id="ch.qos.logback.slf4j" version="0.9.27.v20110224-1110" match="greaterOrEqual"/>
  <plugin id="org.slf4j.api" version="1.6.1.v20100831-0715" match="compatible"/>
  <plugin id="com.ning.async-http-client" version="" match="equivalent"/>
  <plugin id="org.jboss.netty" version="3.2.4.Final-201106061504" match="perfect"/>
  <plugin id="org.hamcrest.core" version="1.1.0.v20090501071000" match="equivalent"/>

Reference: MANIFEST.MF and feature.xml versioning rules from our JCG partner Nick Boldt  at the DivByZero blog.

Related Whitepaper:

Functional Programming in Java: Harnessing the Power of Java 8 Lambda Expressions

Get ready to program in a whole new way!

Functional Programming in Java will help you quickly get on top of the new, essential Java 8 language features and the functional style that will change and improve your code. This short, targeted book will help you make the paradigm shift from the old imperative way to a less error-prone, more elegant, and concise coding style that’s also a breeze to parallelize. You’ll explore the syntax and semantics of lambda expressions, method and constructor references, and functional interfaces. You’ll design and write applications better using the new standards in Java 8 and the JDK.

Get it Now!  

Leave a Reply

× five = 5

Java Code Geeks and all content copyright © 2010-2014, Exelixis Media Ltd | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
All trademarks and registered trademarks appearing on Java Code Geeks are the property of their respective owners.
Java is a trademark or registered trademark of Oracle Corporation in the United States and other countries.
Java Code Geeks is not connected to Oracle Corporation and is not sponsored by Oracle Corporation.

Sign up for our Newsletter

20,709 insiders are already enjoying weekly updates and complimentary whitepapers! Join them now to gain exclusive access to the latest news in the Java world, as well as insights about Android, Scala, Groovy and other related technologies.

As an extra bonus, by joining you will get our brand new e-books, published by Java Code Geeks and their JCG partners for your reading pleasure! Enter your info and stay on top of things,

  • Fresh trends
  • Cases and examples
  • Research and insights
  • Two complimentary e-books